This blog is hosted on Ideas on EuropeIdeas on Europe Avatar

Latest

Women in power: recent research perspectives

History and politics are mostly tales of men on the battlefield or men in dark suits, white shirts and a tie. And as Ewa Widlak showed in “2015, Women and Political Leadership“, only 7.3% of heads of state and 6.5% of heads of government are women right now, so the present doesn’t look much different.

But Ewa, who is researching first ladies, is not the only academic trying to understand whether the time has come for women. In May, the University of London is organising a workshop on “Women, Gender and Political Leadership” (call for papers until 31 March), and its just one of several signs that women in power, or, more broadly, gender aspects of power are receiving increasing attention.

Farida Jalalzai recently asked “Gender, presidencies, and prime ministerships in Europe: Are women gaining ground?” and found that most female top leaders in Europe have been in countries where the are dual executives, i.e. presidents and prime ministers. Silvia Claveria asked “Still a ‘Male Business’?” looking into women in cabinet positions in 23 “advanced industrial democracies” where the share of women in cabinets has risen from 9.3% in 1980-1989 to 28.3% in 2000-2010.

Moving up from national leadership positions to the international level, Kirsten Haack sheds some light on those women who are “Gaining Access to the ‘World’s Largest Men’s Club‘“, that is top positions in United Nations agencies. According to her, 21 women have held Deputy or Under-Secretary-General positions since the first women gained access to the UN’s circle of power in 1987. Counting only Deputy Secretary General and leadship of UN Agencies, there have been only 20 women so far.

Other research by Fabrizio Gilardi shows with statistical data from Swiss municipal elections “that more women ran for office if more women were elected in nearby municipalities in the previous election” (article), although the effect fades over time. A recent study of female representation in the European Parliament that I’ve already discussed finds that it doesn’t seem to be national electoral systems per se that define female representation but rather other mechanisms that still have to be studied.

And Diana Z. O’Brien studied female leaders of political parties in western democracies, finding “that women are more likely to initially come to power in minor opposition parties and those that are losing seat share” (conference article, ). If subsequently their parties win, they are more likely to remain in power, but if their parties lose, they are more likely kicked out again than their male counterparts are, showing that standards and expectations are different for men and women.

All the articles cited above are from 2014 and 2015, demonstrating that there is (growing?) interest in women in power in our discipline, and that articles thereon actually get published. Interestingly, four of the six articles quoted (that I’ve stumbled across in recent weeks) have been written by female academics, one has been co-authored by a woman and a man, and one has been written by a man.

Though anecdotally, this may indicate that the subject of women empowerment  still might be considered a ‘female’ topic.

And there’s more to that: I recently showed that there is no gender balance in political science publishing. What I did not cover was substance.

However, not few of the articles that were  authored by (a majority of) women were actually written on gender-related topics. Most visibly, in the two journal on gender/women and politics in the list of journals I covered, 19 of 23 articles were written by (a majority) of women. The agenda of a recent workshop “Femme: de l’objet au sujet” also shows a majority of female presenters.

In other words, recent increase in interest in women in power appears to be driven by women themselves. In 2015, when still less than 10% of world leaders are female, that doesn’t seem to be enough for a discipline like political science that by its nature should be a driver for political change, uncovering systematic inequality.

Research into women empowerment should be high on the agenda, and political scientists independent of gender should be interested in advancing our knowledge on why inequality persists and why some glass ceilings are breaking. So, contribute and send in your paper proposal for the ”Women, Gender and Political Leadership” or contribute in other ways to this research agenda!

COMMENT

Recent Articles

The committee structure of the European Parliament visualised

Published on by | No Comments
EuropeanParliamentCommitteeNetwork2015

There are many ways to study the European Parliament. Votewatch.eu analyses roll call votes. Integritywatch.eu looks into side activities and side incomes of Members of the European Parliament (MEPs). And political scientists study the European Parliament’s gender balance and many other topics that are of interest to wider or more limited audiences. Anybody who spends time researching, lobbying or […]

(No) Gender balance in political science publishing?

Published on by | 1 Comment
image

My discipline – political science – is far away from gender balance, especially at the top where men still dominate professorships. My impression was that this is also true for (peer-reviewed) publications – and a first look into the reality of 50 different journals seems to confirm this: 66% out of 749 recent research articles […]

Political science journals: An updated list

Published on by | No Comments

To keep on top of the latest publications in political science, I try to follow a range of political science or related journals and the latest articles published therein. So far, this list of (mostly) political science journals and the links to advance online publication articles of these journals has just been a document on my […]

The European careers of the EU’s national leaders (updated)

Published on by | Comments Off

In recent years, more and more top leaders of EU member countries have been elected or nominated who have spent one or several parts of their careers inside EU institutions, soon making it nine eight serving heads of state or heads of government. In fact, today, the Greek government announced that former EU Commissioner Stavros Dimas is nominated […]

The gender balance gap between the European Parliament and national parliaments – updated

Published on by | 3 Comments
Difference in % between the European Parliament (July 2014) and national parliaments (1 October 2014); positive = higher share of women at EU-level

In the December 2014 issue of “European Union Politics” there is a  paper by Fortin-Rittberger & Rittberger* titled “Do electoral rules matter? Explaining national differences in women’s representation in the European Parliament“ (an earlier version in open access here). Looking mainly at data from 2009 (and 2004), the key question of their paper is, in my summary: Why […]

The Barroso legacy: An academic look back (updated)

Published on by | Comments Off

Last week, the European Commission published its own legacy report in the form of a 600+ pages document titled “European Commission 2004 – 2014. A testimony by the president with selected documents“, opening the room for the first analyses of the legacy of 10 years with José Manuel Durão Barroso leading the European Commission. I have […]

The Juncker Commission: On the way to a smaller European Commission?

Published on by | Comments Off

Today, the new President-elect of the European Commission, Jean-Claude Juncker, announced the composition and structure of the European Commission for 2014-2019 (video of the press conference, press release), a Commission that looks much more like a prime minister’s cabinet than any other Commission before. However, is this the first step to a new type of […]

Subscribe to a fortnightly email featuring posts from Ideas on Europe hosted blogs

UACES and Ideas on Europe do not take responsibility for opinions expressed in articles on blogs hosted on Ideas on Europe. All opinions are those of the contributing authors.