This blog is hosted on Ideas on EuropeIdeas on Europe Avatar

Latest

Why Member States and Donors Create Pathologies in International Organizations

Together with my colleague Vytautas Jankauskas, I have blogged over at the E-IR blog about our research on the United Nations. The article is titled “How Well-meaning Donors Create the UN Machinery They Don’t Like“.

For me, this blog post condenses a few of the ideas that have evolved in my head over the past five years of research in the DFG Research Unit “International Public Administration“.

For the past 20 years, there has been talk about the “pathologies of international organizations“, notably their bureaucracies. But I think the focus is wrong. The longer I study international organizations, their politics, and their administrations—in particular all aspects related to their financing and resource mobilization— the more I am convinced that a lot of what’s “wrong” with IOs results from member states and donors own pathologies, not the international administrations.

Until 2014, I spent a lot of time investigating all corners of EU institutions and EU politics (see for example “The European Union Intergrity System“), and the most problematic domains were the ones dominated by member states, e.g. the Council and European Council. Since 2015, I’ve done a lot of field research on the UN, ILO, IOM, UNESCO, UNHCR, UNRWA and WHO and looked into many more UN organizations from my desk at Geschwister-Scholl-Institut in Munich.

And wherever I look, most domains where these agencies are said to fail to deliver, or to reform, or to be accountable, member states and donors are not far. Whether individual states or all of them collectively in often arcane intergovernment decision-making bodies, they are usually at the heart of systemic failures. At best, it’s a combination of member state and bureaucratic failure, as we have shown in the case of UNESCO’s budget crisis.

The sub-title of my book “Managing Money and Discord in the UN” (Oxford University Press 2019, with Klaus H. Goetz)— “Budgeting and Bureaucracy“—captures this realization. In my research on UN budgeting in New York, it became obvious pretty quickly that it’s micro-managing member states in the UNGA’s Fifth Committee and the weird politics of the ACABQ that produce a lot of unnecessary bureaucratic work for the UN administration.

In other cases, such as the World Health Organization, the dependence on voluntary contributions requires the setting up of entire fundraising departments. Those existing also UNHCR, UNRWA and many other UN agencies (see an overview in this conference paper from 2015. At the same time, evaluation units and all kinds of evaluation procedures blossom in the UN in response to every increasing accountability requirements as new research from my colleagues Steffen Eckhard and Vytautas Jankauskas shows.

Thus, bureaucracy increases because of member states financing, their urge for micromanagment and the resulting reporting obligations for UN bureaucracies. The challenge is that there’s no simple solution to all of that. But it’s clearly not the UN’s administration that can address existing pathologies alone.

In our blog post, Vytas and I conclude that fixing the so-called “broken” UN bureaucracy therefore can only be solved by ultimately fixing multilateralism – not by re-arranging just a few funding practices that have evolved over the past 70 years and then hoping that everything will be fine. However, I’m not sure the 190+ states and their political leaders are up to the task of ending their pathological reign on the system of international organizations.

 

COMMENT

Recent Articles

Reform und Finanzierung der Vereinten Nationen – Zum 80. Geburtstag von Klaus Hüfner

Published on by | Comments Off on Reform und Finanzierung der Vereinten Nationen – Zum 80. Geburtstag von Klaus Hüfner

Am vergangenen Dienstag (22. Januar 2019) war ich in Berlin, auf der DGVN-Veranstaltung “UNbezahlbar! Reform und Finanzierung der Vereinten Nationen in bewegten Zeiten” zu Ehren des 80. Geburtstags von Klaus Hüfner. Klaus Hüfner ist seit Jahrzehnten mit Abstand der wichtigste Experte zum Thema UN-Finanzen in Deutschland, und die Veranstaltung war – dieser Expertise angemessen – […]

2019 in Political Science (3) – Gleichstellung und Konflikte

Published on by | Comments Off on 2019 in Political Science (3) – Gleichstellung und Konflikte

Ich bin jetzt seit gut vier Jahren stellvertretende Frauenbeauftragte der Sozialwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der LMU München. In Bayern nennt sich diese Funktion, nach dem Gesetz, immer noch so – “Frauenbeauftragte”. In anderen Bundesländern heißt es meist “Gleichstellungsbeauftragte(r)”. Aber die Bezeichnung ist mir nicht so wichtig. Wichtig ist, dass sich etwas tut. Und das geht häufig nicht […]

2019 in Political Science (2) – Secrecy in Europe and Academic Trajectories

Published on by | Comments Off on 2019 in Political Science (2) – Secrecy in Europe and Academic Trajectories

I have promised to blog more frequently this year and to share how life and work as a political scientist looks like from my end. For this week’s post, I use the occasion of Vigjilenca Abazi‘s announcement that her monograph “Secrecy and Oversight in the EU” is soon to be published with Oxford University Press (Buy it! Read […]

2019 in Political Science (1) – A Personal Account

Published on by | Comments Off on 2019 in Political Science (1) – A Personal Account

My path into political science as a profession was never planned. It started rather accidentally, quite exactly 10 years ago, without me knowing that I would end up where I am today. This year, in 2019, I will try to regularly blog about this profession, my own research, and the research of others – even […]

Replik auf “Das Ende der Geduld” (FAZ): Ein anderer Blick auf die ECPR-Konferenz und moderne Politikwissenschaft

Published on by | 1 Comment

Es ist 6 Uhr morgens in Boston. Ich bin seit über einer Stunde wach. Jetlag. Zeit, um eine Replik auf “Das Ende der Geduld” von Dr. Hannah Bethke – selbst Politikwissenschaftlerin – in der FAZ zu schreiben. Eine Replik mit Blick auf unser Fach und die Natur von wissenschaftlichen Großkonferenzen wie die ECPR. Ich bin […]

Leaking and leak prevention in the European Commission

Published on by | Comments Off on Leaking and leak prevention in the European Commission

============= UPDATE (15 December 2017): The European Ombudsman has concluded that the European Commission did not provide me with sufficient access to documents in my research on EU leaks. The full case assessment by the Ombudsman is published here. The Commission now has time until March to reassess my requests for access. ============= Today, my […]

Freedom of information in international organizations

Published on by | Comments Off on Freedom of information in international organizations

One year ago, I sent an email to the UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, David Kaye (@davidkaye), in reaction to a public consultation, not knowing whether it mattered. Now that his report on “Access to Information in International Organizations” is published, I realized that I was one […]

Why the EU should start contingency-planning for Brexit budget cuts

Published on by | Comments Off on Why the EU should start contingency-planning for Brexit budget cuts

I’ve just read Jon Worth’s blog post about why he’s calm about the start of the Article 50 negotiations that will most likely lead to Brexit, even if these negotiations are heading to a fight. After spending the best of my last three years researching budgeting in international organisations, including the effects of budget cuts […]

UN budgets for 2018-19 : tracing decision-making across the UN system [regularly updated]

Published on by | Comments Off on UN budgets for 2018-19 : tracing decision-making across the UN system [regularly updated]

In our research on UN budgeting (results and early insights published for example here, here, here), we follow budget procedures throughout the UN system, in particular in the UN proper and in the Specialised Agencies of the UN. This post collects the most relevant documents, in particular UN system budget outlines, proposals, and final budgets adopted. The […]

UACES and Ideas on Europe do not take responsibility for opinions expressed in articles on blogs hosted on Ideas on Europe. All opinions are those of the contributing authors.